For foreclosure and creditors’ rights firms

Find the conflict in the file before anyone else does

CaseSifter reads every filing and exhibit in a matter and flags contradictions, altered documents, and timeline conflicts — so your attorneys review them, not a servicer, a court, or opposing counsel.

Sits next to CaseAware · Documents stored per matter · Attorney decides what to raise

app.casesifter.com
CS
CaseSifterFind what matters in the record.
Account
2 material interrupts Case Impact
2 material 1 altered
Default date conflict Case fact conflict ▾

Claim: “Default occurred 3/1/2023” — Affidavit of Merit

Evidence: “Default occurred 4/1/2023” — Loan History

Same fact stated two ways. Candidate for review — not a finding of fact.

Exhibit appears edited Altered · Apparent contradiction ▸

Alongside the system you already run

CaseAware runs the matter — CaseSifter reads the record

Most default firms already run CaseAware IQX — or a system like it — for workflows, pleadings, servicer portals, and compliance. That stack is built to move the file. It is not built to compare every affidavit against every exhibit and tell you where the facts diverge.

CaseSifter does not replace that system. Drop filings into a matter, get a short list of what is worth an attorney’s look, and leave CaseAware as the system of record.

What a managing partner is buying

Not another dashboard. A second read of the file, before it leaves the firm.

Protect the file

Catch a default date that shifts, an exhibit that looks edited, or an amount that does not reconcile — before it is in a motion, a hearing, or a servicer Q&A.

Give the team time back

Associates stop hand-cross-referencing forty exhibits against the affidavit of merit. They open a triaged list and verify what actually matters.

Show the client the diligence

Every flag cites its source language. Nothing auto-files, auto-notifies, or auto-escalates. Your attorneys decide what to raise.

Three steps — no new workflow

Use the matter the way you already organize a foreclosure file. CaseSifter does the reading.

1

Add filings

Drag in complaints, motions, affidavits, payment histories, and exhibits as the matter progresses.

2

The file is read

Metadata, PDF integrity, page structure, image forensics, text/OCR, and cross-document checks run on every file.

3

Review what is flagged

A risk score, a findings report, and Case Impact — a short board of material interrupts across the matter, ready to verify and use.

app.casesifter.com
CS
CaseSifterFind what matters in the record.
Account

Case

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Alvarez

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. · Alvarez 850214/2024 Supreme Court, Kings County

Add filings

Triage

Filter the table by risk

High risk3 Moderate5 Low risk10
2 material interrupts · 1 fraud exhibit Case Impact
2 material 1 altered
Default date conflict Case fact conflict ▸
Exhibit appears edited Altered · Apparent contradiction ▸

Authenticity report

Affidavit of Merit.pdf

SummaryFindingsSourceTimelineComparisonAudit trail
Metadata timestamp anomalyCreated-after-modified date on a supposedly contemporaneous record.
Uneven JPEG recompressionLocalized artifact near the account-balance figure, consistent with splicing.
PDF structure consistentNo embedded JavaScript, unapplied redactions, or layer anomalies.

Built for high-volume default work

The value is not the scan. It is what the scan lets the firm stop doing by hand — and stop missing.

Across the whole matter

A date, a balance, or a signature that looks fine alone can conflict with something filed six months earlier. CaseSifter checks the whole case, every time.

Quiet on noise

Exhibit-lettering drift, caption headers, and expected loan-status movement after default stay off the list. What remains is short enough to review.

Stored with the matter

Source PDFs stay with the matter so re-scan and preview do not require locating the file again. Encrypted facts persist alongside them.

Bring one active matter to the call

We will walk through what CaseSifter flags on a real foreclosure file — and what it leaves alone — so you can judge it the way you judge any other tool in the stack.

Request a demo